nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet vs. Telephone company
From: Allan Chong <allan () bellsouth net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 01:24:37 -0800
William Allen Simpson wrote:
existing lines turned on anyway). They refuse to let us co-locate in the CO (they cannot find an official policy, and thus cannot allow
it).
Colocating in a CO is kinda difficult with good reason. They have to engineer power for you (and internet equipment draws a lot more power than they're used to) and the whole issue of access is difficult. Given that you're not internal or on their approved list, you'd probably have to be supervised while in the CO. Even the interexchange carriers tend to maintain a minimal amount of equipment in the CO and typically have an adjacent building for their stuff. There is just a whole lot of open card racks, large bundles of cable, and other stuff that you wouldn't want anyone wandering around near. I know 2 people (at small companies) that have succeeded in getting fiber run out to their location and the lines broken off there It was about half a racks worth of telco equipment (locked) in their facility. It really facilitated local loop installation. You might want to pursue this. allan
Current thread:
- Internet vs. Telephone company Michael Shields (Feb 01)
- Re: Internet vs. Telephone company Doug Tooley (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Internet vs. Telephone company Stephen Sprunk (Feb 01)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Paul J. Zawada (Feb 01)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Michael Dillon (Feb 01)
- Re: Internet vs. Telephone company William Allen Simpson (Feb 02)
- Re: Internet vs. Telephone company Allan Chong (Feb 04)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Kent W. England (Feb 03)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Tim Brown (Feb 03)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Brian Tackett (Feb 03)
- Re: Internet vs. Telephone company Jeremy Porter (Feb 03)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Tim Brown (Feb 03)