nanog mailing list archives
Re: F means filtered ?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 11:13:28 -0500
"Justin W. Newton" writes:
At 07:48 PM 2/16/97 -0500, Avi Freedman wrote:It seems to me, Jim, that a reasonable person would assume that he allows access to the services that it's supposed to provide (DNS), but reserves the right to 'F'ilter services that are immaterial to the DNS functionality.I think actually the question that Jim was asking is whether Paul filters access to the root name server he runs based on his Spam Blacklist.
No. The whole thing was started when Paul stated that he permitted a particular root name server to be pinged and tracerouted "against his better judgement", meaning he's pondered filtering particular classes of traffic. Perry - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- F means filtered ? Jim Fleming (Feb 16)
- Re: F means filtered ? Avi Freedman (Feb 16)
- Re: F means filtered ? Christopher E. Stefan (Feb 16)
- Re: F means filtered ? Paul A Vixie (Feb 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: F means filtered ? Jim Fleming (Feb 17)
- Re: F means filtered ? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 17)
- Re: F means filtered ? Justin W. Newton (Feb 17)
- Re: F means filtered ? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 18)
- Re: F means filtered ? Paul A Vixie (Feb 18)
- Re: F means filtered ? Karl Denninger (Feb 18)
- Re: F means filtered ? Racer X (Feb 19)
- Re: F means filtered ? Avi Freedman (Feb 19)
- Re: F means filtered ? Ehud Gavron (Feb 19)
- Re: F means filtered ? George Herbert (Feb 19)
- Re: F means filtered ? Racer X (Feb 19)
- Re: F means filtered ? Edward Henigin (Feb 19)