nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability
From: Pushpendra Mohta <pushp () CERF NET>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 22:23:35 +73600 (PST)
Paul A Vixie writes:
IMHO, as long as money is involved, and as long as someone thinks that they have a chance of getting away with something, they will try it.Entirely agreed. On the other hand I have what is turning out to be a unique (here) point of view about this. I don't want to prevent this kind of theft -- I want to discover it, and remove perpetrators from any IXP where they try it. I don't want to block it. I want to ensure that it is never tried twice. I appear to be in the minority wrt this view.
Current thread:
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Dennis Ferguson (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Sherman Tuan (Jan 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Pushpendra Mohta (Jan 31)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Andrew Partan (Feb 01)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Kent W. England (Feb 03)
- RE: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Robert Wilson (Feb 03)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Jeff Young (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Alec H. Peterson (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability John Hawkinson (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Scott Blandford (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Jeff Young (Feb 05)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Erik Sherk (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Alex.Bligh (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Jeff Young (Feb 04)