nanog mailing list archives

Re: ip directed-broadcast


From: Ken Leland <kwl () shell monmouth com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 13:09:26 -0500 (EST)

Jon wrote: 
about what I wrote:
1.)   they will not continue to try to trace this. (they had made 
        some previous unsuccessful efforts)

Strike 1.

2.)   they will no longer filter icmp echo reply for me, even though
        they understand that my link is now useless without that.
    They do not have cpu cycles to spare for this purpose.

or few line filters push the CPU over the edge....Strike 2.

3.)   they do not see this type of attack very often and don't 
        consider it much of a problem.

Sure...it causes them very little trouble.  Odds are good their NOC gets
smurfed very rarely.  Strike 3.


Yep 3 strikes and you're out. Sad, I've gotten excellent service
from this provider until this recent policy snafu.

NOC and let them know that you consider your T1 to Sprint unusable, and do
not intend to pay the next bill...at least no in full.

calls into the account rep already placed on this issue.

FDT used to have major problems with smurf attacks...I was getting to be
on a first name basis with most of UUNET's NOC graveyard shift.  They'd
usually put in a temporary filter to stop the attack, though sometimes it
took longer than other's.  What finally stopped the attacks was looking at
who/what was being attacked.  At least in our case, systems weren't being
smurfed just for the heck of it.  Generally, there was something going on
that was (justifiably or not) pissing someone somewhere off.  Make sure
your users and systems are behaving, and the smurfing is likely to stop. 


Yep, I know right off hand of several possibilities. A possibly disgruntled
former employee who just lost a case against us in court the day before
the attack started, or a guy that posts rather obnoxious stuff to the
local nj newsgroups that a lot of people dislike, etc. With 7000 customers,
you will ocasionally find one that is not as polite as he(she) should be.
We do respond quickly to abuse/postmaster/sysadmin complaints so I don't 
believe we are sitting on pentup outrage over our customers abusing other 
networks/systems with no recourse.  Of course, this could be a snit
where the other side doesn't particularly want to tell their story to
management types.

Ken Leland


Current thread: