nanog mailing list archives
Re: caching at windmills (i mean exchange points)
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 97 09:14 PST
I read your proposal an have a question. I assume that your MAE-west cache will act as a parent for the MW ISP's (otherwise, there's no data in the cache). That means that all outbound traffic from MW is routed through your cache, isn't it? That also means that e.g. all transatlantic traffic will flow through your lines. Or am I missing something?
You are not differentiating between an proxy cache and an interceptor cache. The NLANR cache is a proxy cache. Clients/peers/children must consciously point at it. randy
Current thread:
- Re: caching at windmills (i mean exchange points) Ton Verschuren (Dec 02)
- Re: caching at windmills (i mean exchange points) Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: caching at windmills (i mean exchange points) Ton Verschuren (Dec 05)
- Re: caching at windmills (i mean exchange points) Alan Barrett (Dec 05)
- Re: caching at windmills (i mean exchange points) Ton Verschuren (Dec 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: caching at windmills (i mean exchange points) Duane Wessels (Dec 05)
- Re: caching at windmills (i mean exchange points) Ton Verschuren (Dec 05)
- Re: caching at windmills (i mean exchange points) Randy Bush (Dec 02)