nanog mailing list archives
Re: Whoa; the 3 network?
From: Eric Osborne <osborne () notcom com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 21:30:00 -0500 (EST)
How then can you justify needing more than a single Class-B, or at most two or three worldwide?
I recall seeing a comment about using the public Internet as private data transfer. Since the smallest prefix you can advertise on the Internet is /24, that breaks up the aforementioned Class B into 256 blocks. Given that GTE (or any large corporation) is likely is divide its remote offices up in headcounts of 254, there's room for inefficiency there. I could easily see a use for _at least_ 4 Class B's, if not more. eric
Current thread:
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Randall Pigott (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? John Cavanaugh (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Roy (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Philip J. Nesser II (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Kim Hubbard (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Ravi Pina (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Dan Boehlke (Dec 24)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Marc Slemko (Dec 23)
- Address Reclaimation bmanning (Dec 23)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Randall Pigott (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Eric Osborne (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Wayne Bouchard (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Eric Osborne (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Wayne Bouchard (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Howard C. Berkowitz (Dec 24)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Henry Steuart (Dec 25)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Dean Anderson (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Eric Osborne (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Dean Anderson (Dec 25)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Richard Welty (Dec 24)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Karl Denninger (Dec 24)