nanog mailing list archives
Re: Broadcast pings.
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 18:59:36 -0500
At 05:32 PM 12/23/97 -0600, Phil Howard wrote:
When a packet arrives, take note of the interface and gateway it came from. Check the route tables for where a reply to this packet could be delivered. Don't choose only the best route, but compare where the packet came from with all valid reply routes (except broad defaults larger than a certain size that can be configured). If the packet came from where it is valid to reply, then allow the packet to proceed. If not, then discard it (an ICMP probably won't make it back to the right place anyway).
Yes. Some of us call this 'unicast RPF'. Your point is well taken. ;-) - paul
Current thread:
- Broadcast pings. Jamie Scheinblum (Dec 22)
- Re: [nanog] Broadcast pings. Stephen Balbach (Dec 22)
- Re: Broadcast pings. Joe Shaw (Dec 23)
- Re: Broadcast pings. Stephen Balbach (Dec 23)
- Re: Broadcast pings. Phil Howard (Dec 23)
- Re: Broadcast pings. Paul Ferguson (Dec 23)
- Re: Broadcast pings. Dean Anderson (Dec 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Broadcast pings. Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Broadcast pings. Al Roethlisberger (Dec 22)
- RE: Broadcast pings. Al Roethlisberger (Dec 22)
- RE: Broadcast pings. Jamie Scheinblum (Dec 22)