nanog mailing list archives
Re: perf #s for GRF vs 7500 Re: Anyone Deployed Ascend's GRF IP S witch?
From: Rob Skrobola <rjs () ans net>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 14:14:10 -0400
Chris, Really, I wasn't comparing. Mostly I was just responding to the bgp memory usage issue, and noted load on the boxes to indicate that these were not unused boxes doing that number of peers. >From: "Chris A. Icide" <chris () nap net> > Comparing your BAY routers to everyone elses is like comparing a >top fuel dragster to someones 69 Chevelle street racer. You folks have some >heavily modified software and hardware, from what I understand. Actually, we use stock bcn/bln hardware. As to general availability of the software mods, I don't really know.. RobS > However, we've got a couple of BAY BCN/BLN routers about, and the >numbers that have been mentioned previously in this thread are fairly accurate. >
Current thread:
- RE: perf #s for GRF vs 7500 Re: Anyone Deployed Ascend's GRF IP S witch? Chris A. Icide (Aug 27)
- Re: perf #s for GRF vs 7500 Re: Anyone Deployed Ascend's GRF IP S witch? Rob Skrobola (Aug 27)
- Re: perf #s for GRF vs 7500 Re: Anyone Deployed Ascend's GRF IP S witch? Jeffrey Burgan (Aug 27)
- RE: perf #s for GRF vs 7500 Re: Anyone Deployed Ascend's GRF IP S witch? Jeremy Hinton (Aug 28)
- Re: perf #s for GRF vs 7500 Re: Anyone Deployed Ascend's GRF IP S witch? Rob Skrobola (Aug 28)