nanog mailing list archives
Re: Loadsa ICMP...
From: Jon Green <jcgreen () netins net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 15:12:51 -0500
On Wed, 13 Aug 1997 14:40:05 -0500, ed () texas net writes:
realize here that doubling (or tripling, or quadrupling) the CPU power of the cisco will not help. Upgrading from an rsp2 to an rsp4 would buy you about 3 times 3.5Kpps, say around 10Kpps, process switched. That's still hardly enough to save you when you're being smurfed.
That's my point. The answer is to get rid of the concept of an RSP completely. A box with a central CPU is never going to scale as well as a distributed processor design no matter how many MHz you throw at it. There ARE vendors that have such designs (and have had such designs for about the past 5 years or so..) While admittedly I (strongly) dislike Cisco, it is in the best interest of the entire Internet to see them build a better box. With 80% of the routers in the Internet being Cisco, these types of DoS attacks make me a bit nervous about our future when the infrastructure is built on what is IMHO a non-scalable architecture. -Jon ----------------------------------------------------------------- * Jon Green * "Life's a dance * * jcgreen () netINS net * you learn as you go" * * Finger for Geek Code/PGP * * * #include "std_disclaimer.h" * http://www.netins.net/showcase/jcgreen * -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Loadsa ICMP... Lyndon Levesley (Aug 13)
- Re: Loadsa ICMP... Edward Henigin (Aug 13)
- Re: Loadsa ICMP... Alex.Bligh (Aug 13)
- Re: Loadsa ICMP... Jon Green (Aug 13)
- Re: Loadsa ICMP... Edward Henigin (Aug 13)
- Re: Loadsa ICMP... Jon Green (Aug 13)
- Re: Loadsa ICMP... Tony Li (Aug 13)
- Re: Loadsa ICMP... Tony Li (Aug 13)
- Re: Loadsa ICMP... Jon Green (Aug 13)
- Re: Loadsa ICMP... Tony Li (Aug 13)
- Re: Loadsa ICMP... Edward Henigin (Aug 13)