nanog mailing list archives

Re: Filtering Source Addresses on gw-internet


From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () inorganic5 fdt net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 16:16:38 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, C. Jon Larsen wrote:


Thats what I thought at first. But if the permit comes first, then packets
with valid source addresses (a.b.c.d) get out because they pass that rule.

So a packet built like:

Source-> a.b.c.d  Dest-> 172.17.0.0

will get out and be passed to the ISP, wasting bandwidth. Thats why I deny
them first, and then do the permit later on in the list. 

Ah...I wasn't reading your rules closely enough.  As a trick to reduce
access-list length on my internet gatway, I nailed up static routes like:

ip route 208.215.0.0    255.255.240.0   null0 250
ip route 205.229.48.0   255.255.240.0   null0 250
ip route 10.0.0.0       255.0.0.0       null0 250
ip route 172.16.0.0     255.240.0.0     null0 250
ip route 192.168.0.0    255.255.0.0     null0 250

The first two are our netblocks.  The rest just stop packets for the
"private IP" nets from leaving our network.  I also have access-list rules
that prevent them from entering our network.  I'm assuming here that route
cache hits are faster than access-list testing.


------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis <jlewis () fdt net>  |  Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
 Network Administrator       |  be proof-read for $199/message.
 Florida Digital Turnpike    |  
______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____



Current thread: