nanog mailing list archives
Nuclear power for POPs
From: John Curran <jcurran () bbnplanet com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 16:09:08 -0400
At 14:50 8/8/97, William Duncanson wrote:
I'll be more than happy to leverage my experience from my Nuclear Engineering days to help Internet companies plan for these redundant power plants. Each load of fuel would be good for about 18 to 24 months of sustained operation, and we could even design it so that should it experience an explosion, there is no confusion or expectation on the performance and viability of colocated and nearby equipment. ChrisSign me up! I want one of these in my back yard. I figure I could probably run the whole block off of one of these.
It may soon be necessary to include one of these in each POP, given notable vendors increasing power demands... Chris, can you do 23" open rack designs? ;-) /John
Current thread:
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Sean M. Doran (Aug 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Rodney Joffe (Aug 08)
- Nuclear power for POPs John Curran (Aug 08)
- Re: Nuclear power for POPs Vadim Antonov (Aug 08)
- Re: Nuclear power for POPs Wayne Bouchard (Aug 08)
- Re: Nuclear power for POPs Rusty Zickefoose (Aug 08)
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Rodney Joffe (Aug 08)
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Thomas Irpan (Aug 09)
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Chris A. Icide (Aug 08)
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Tim Gibson (Aug 08)