nanog mailing list archives

Re: Peering points

From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 01:43:27 -0400 (EDT)

On Sun, Apr 06, 1997 at 07:53:26PM -0400, Nathan Stratton wrote:


Well then why did they require us to have FULL T3 into that NAP?


Well, because you are not a Sprint CUSTOMER, which is exactly the type
of connection that Avi was talking about (transit customer
connections).

Alec


And because there was a provider who had a T1 into the NAP for quite
some time :)

Anyway, why would you put less than a "FULL T3" into that NAP?

Avi

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Current thread:

RE: peering points, (continued)
- RE: peering points Brian Smith (Apr 01)
- Re: Peering points Sean Donelan (Apr 01)
  - Re: Peering points Mike Leber (Apr 01)
  - Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 05)
- Re: Peering points Sean Donelan (Apr 05)
- RE: Peering points Rodney Joffe (Apr 05)
- RE: Peering points Dave Van Allen (Apr 06)
  - Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
    - Re: Peering points Nathan Stratton (Apr 06)
    - Re: Peering points Alec H. Peterson (Apr 06)
    - Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
    - Re: Peering points Steve Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Apr 07)
    - Re: Peering points Randy Bush (Apr 07)
    - Re: Peering points Edward Fang (Apr 06)
- RE: Peering points Dave Van Allen (Apr 06)
  - Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- RE: Peering points Steve Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Apr 07)