nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering versus Transit
From: Peter Galbavy <peter () wonderland org>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 08:41:09 +0100 (BST)
You mean that if I have data to go to Sprint, typically a Sprint customer who has requested said data, that I'm not supposed to route it to Sprint unless *I* have some agreement with Sprint?!?It scares me to see this question on this list.
It scares me that Randy still thinks he is important enough to make such a patronising remark. If you have wisdom, help the world and pass it on... if you are stupid then shutp the f*** up. Regards, -- Peter Galbavy peter () wonderland org @ Home phone://44/973/499465 in Wonderland http://www.wonderland.org/~peter/ snail://UK/NW1_6LE/London/21_Harewood_Avenue/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Peering versus Transit, (continued)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Lon R. Stockton, Jr. (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Randy Bush (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Alan Hannan (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Michael Dillon (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Nathan Stratton (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Michael Dillon (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Lon R. Stockton, Jr. (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Sean Doran (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Peter Galbavy (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Michael Dillon (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Peter Galbavy (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Avi Freedman (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Alex.Bligh (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Peter Galbavy (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Nathan Stratton (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Alan Hannan (Sep 29)