nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering versus Transit
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () jain com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 18:53:49 -0400 (EDT)
Maybe I didn't make the point clear enough. This is *not* something our engineers were joking about doing. This was a discussion of what could be done, and how as an NSP we could account for it at our routers between our customers and us. -Deepak. On Sun, 29 Sep 1996, Michael S. Ramsey wrote:
On Sun, 29 Sep 1996, Deepak Jain wrote:What are the various opinions on this behavior?Be prepared to back-pay for services rendered or end up in prison. To say nothing of the loss of your business. -- Michael Ramsey (KD4OKR) msr () interpath net | INTERPATH Senior Technician | info () interpath net (919)890-6300v (919)890-6319f | http://www.interpath.net 711 Hillsborough St., Raleigh, NC 27605 | helpdesk () interpath net
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Peering versus Transit, (continued)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Peter Galbavy (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Neil J. McRae (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Neil J. McRae (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Robert Bowman (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Alex.Bligh (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Nathan Stratton (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Deepak Jain (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Michael S. Ramsey (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Deepak Jain (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Nathan Stratton (Sep 29)