nanog mailing list archives
Re: A modest proposal
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 22:38:36 -0400 (EDT)
perhaps a change in the packet density during the attack might suggest that an intermediate circuit is becoming congested. if this is the case, then ISPs may be able to look at known high-use corrodors instead of groping around blindly. or, conversely, if there is a steady stream at 2Kpps, that might be enough to allow a smaller provider to discount part of the topology that is not able to support that kind of traffic. i think that Alexis said that the 2nd attack involved something like 7 panix machines--just how much bandwidth is needed to support a 2Kpps attack on 7 machines? -arthur
Without giving too many details, I will say that there was never a 2kpps attack on panix.. Avi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: A modest proposal, (continued)
- Re: A modest proposal Dalvenjah FoxFire (Sep 17)
- Re: A modest proposal Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 17)
- Re: A modest proposal Dalvenjah FoxFire (Sep 17)
- Message not available
- Re: A modest proposal Kelly J. Cooper (Sep 18)
- Re: A modest proposal Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 18)
- Message not available
- Re: A modest proposal Kelly J. Cooper (Sep 18)
- Re: A modest proposal Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 17)
- Re: A modest proposal Michael Dillon (Sep 17)
- Re: A modest proposal Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 17)
- Re: A modest proposal Arthur Hyun (Sep 17)
- Re: A modest proposal Avi Freedman (Sep 17)
- Re: A modest proposal Dima Volodin (Sep 17)
- Re: A modest proposal Avi Freedman (Sep 17)
- SYN attack. how does it *really* work Jonathan M. Bresler (Sep 17)
- Re: A modest proposal Curtis Villamizar (Sep 17)
- Re: A modest proposal Michael Dillon (Sep 17)