nanog mailing list archives
Re: Access to the Internic Blocked
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 1996 15:53:19 -0400
In message <xoienkiiahn.fsf () chops icp net>, Sean Doran writes:
Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net> writes:There are routers that handle {LS}SRR at near full speed. Stuffing it on the broken path in is a bug. Fast-path/broken-path is just a bug.I'm not sure I agree, particularly in the case where "broken-path" involves delegating work to another processor.
Whenever you discover that in your design you risk sending 5,000-10,000 little delegations of work per second from one processor to another and taking the entire box down in the process it is time to seriously consider whether you've made the right design decisions. That's all. Curtis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Sean Doran (Sep 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Sean Doran (Sep 03)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Curtis Villamizar (Sep 03)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Sean Doran (Sep 04)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Curtis Villamizar (Sep 04)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Curtis Villamizar (Sep 03)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Sean Doran (Sep 04)