nanog mailing list archives

Re: customers and web servers and level one naps


From: Gordon Cook <cook () netaxs com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 21:47:45 -0400 (EDT)

ARGH!!!!

On Fri, 6 Sep 1996, Peter Lothberg wrote:

Second:  allowing such a customer, or an NSP, to attach web services
directly to the FDDI ring at the NAP.

Peter:  If I had thought through the topology of the situation I too
blithly described in the above sentence, the pieces of equipment involved,
and what bits were flowing where, even at my not really sophisticated
level of knowledge, i might have seen the problem that placing a web
server with nothing between it and the gigaswitch FDDI port would have
involved.

Instead, feeling far too confident that I remembered a 14 hour old phone
conversation with stephen stuart correctly, I wrote what i thought I had
heard.  I am fully aware now that I heard mistakenly.  But I also had no
earthly idea what a cow pie I had stepped into.  I would be happy to let
this die.

But since I was not and am not trying to cause problems for the Palo Alto
digital people I have no choice but to answer it - for you write as though
he (stuart-dec-paix) had not corrected my error - something that he has
done.

This is a security problem, if there is no switch in the middle and
each host are induvidually attached to the switch.

Next problem is that a host needs to knew what router to send a
packet to for a particular destination, so either it points
default at one of the NAP routers, and packets traverse the NAP
twice, or the host impleements BGP and has a full set of routes.

So host at a the NAP media should be 'strongly not recomended'.

Thank you for a good explanation of some of the major reasons why such a
topology would be ill-advised.   ;-)


An interesting scenario is, a router with two FDDI interfaces, one to
the host and one to the NAP. It now comes down to if it's worth
the real_estate to have the host there.

What you have just described, is what, if I now understand things
correctly, exists at the Palo Alto Internet exchange.


--Peter

Gordon Cook

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: