nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Memory.
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 13:21:09 -0400 (EDT)
Nathan, I have to follow up on this comment you made. I work for an ISP in Indianapolis called IHETS. We have 7 cisco 7500 series routers on our backbone. Wre just spent a chunck of money to upgrade the RAM on them to 64Meg. If yoiu are saying that regular SIMMS work in Cicso routers, then I'll shoot myself in the foot. I'd like to know if you have used this method and how well it works out in the field. Does latency increase with *unqualified* Cisco memory, or is the *unqualified* *qualified* Cisco ram stuff just a big ruse? Thanks for your input.
I'd pay attention if they disqualify memory. But we've found that standard x36 16mb 70pin (60ns) simms work fine in 7500s. I suspect it'd either work or not - you won't get added latency... Avi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Cisco Memory. Patrick Lynch (Oct 21)
- Re: Cisco Memory. Avi Freedman (Oct 21)
- Re: Cisco Memory. Nathan Stratton (Oct 21)
- Airplane crashing into Atlanta-NAP Nathan Stratton (Oct 26)
- Re: Airplane crashing into Atlanta-NAP Avi Freedman (Oct 26)
- Re: Airplane crashing into Atlanta-NAP Nathan Stratton (Oct 26)
- Re: Airplane crashing into Atlanta-NAP Darin Wayrynen (Oct 26)
- Re: Airplane crashing into Atlanta-NAP Nathan Stratton (Oct 26)
- Re: Atlanta-NAP's choice of switch Jonathan Heiliger (Oct 26)
- Re: Atlanta-NAP's choice of switch Darin Wayrynen (Oct 26)
- Re: Airplane crashing into Atlanta-NAP Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 27)
- Re: Cisco Memory. Nathan Stratton (Oct 21)
- Re: Cisco Memory. Avi Freedman (Oct 21)
- Re: Airplane crashing into Atlanta-NAP Jon Zeeff (Oct 26)