Re: GigaRouter (Was Re: Cisco as Big Brother))

["Daryn D. Fisher" <oz () thoughtport net>]

Begin forwarded message:

Subject: Re: GigaRouter (Was Re: Cisco as Big Brother))
To: freedman () netaxs com (Avi Freedman)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 17:46:54 +0400 (AMT)
Cc: alex () relcom eu net, nanog () merit edu, paul () vix com
In-Reply-To: <199610211323.JAA25866 () access netaxs com> from "Avi  
Freedman" at Oct 21, 96 09:23:08 am
From: edd () acm org
Sender: owner-nanog () merit edu

the livingston comparision is not even warrented, they lack any  
real extensible functionality (only RIP for one exam.)

and with over 30% failure rate on hardware, don't even think about it.

> Bay is not.  Proteon is not.  Gated (for me, so far) is not.
> Microrouters are not.  Morningstars are/(?were?).  Livingstons
> are not.

Why Livingstons are not??? They're terribly easy to configure, IMHO...

> > Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
>
> I can only speak for myself, of course.

Me too,


Ed

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -