nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cisco's AIP vs HSSI


From: "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 10:06:17 -0700

At 10:58 AM 15-10-96 -0400, Avi Freedman wrote:
    This is based on my feeling that HDLC is more efficent
     than ATM signaling/framing.

Agreed...
But it's not a feeling, it's a fact :)

--bill

Avi




While this is certainly true, HDLC is a point-to-point protocol
and not a network protocol, like frame relay, SMDS or ATM. And
HDLC itself isn't quite enough, IMHO, you really need PPP.

And the efficiency lost to ATM is not 40% as often claimed on this
list, but rather it is 12% less efficient than PPP for TCP. 
10% is the cell header overhead and 2% is due to modulo 48 padding, 
given actual traffic at FIX West as measured by kc at NLANR.

--Kent

We return to our regularly scheduled ATM tweaking program now in 
progress.
:-)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: