nanog mailing list archives

Re: Peering is a lot of work.


From: "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:00:49 -0800

At 03:10 PM 29-10-96 -0500, Justin W. Newton wrote:

One can point default at someone whether or not they are peering with the
person.  I am somewhat confused by the thought that people believe that
they need to be peering with someone to have that person point default at
them.  I could (I don't, but I could), point default at /anyone/ on the
same switch fabric as me, whether they are peering with me or not.  Why do
people continue to tie these 2 issues together?

The two issues are intertwined because whether or not default is tied to 
peering depends on which sort of media your public exchange uses. A FDDI 
exchange point will allow anyone to point default at anyone else without 
any explicit BGP peering or FDDI configuration, but an ATM NAP requires a 
permanent virtual circuit to be established between two peers before traffic 
can flow and this requires the consent of both peers. Therefore,  on an ATM 
NAP, you are not subject to default-abuse by non-peers.


--Kent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: