nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: Compu$erve RFC 1123 5.3.3 violation
From: Kevin Smith <kevin () ascend com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 15:21:45 -0800
At 03:12 PM 11/20/96 -0800, Brian Murrell wrote:
from the quill of Alan Barrett <apb () iafrica com> on scroll <Pine.NEB.3.95.961117113159.131G-100000 () apb iafrica com>I certainly don't see that bouncing mail with a "mailbox is full" error is a violation of RFC1123 section 5.3.3.The fact that there was a bounce was not the complaint. The fact that the bounce went back to the author of the article, not the sender was the complaint.
Hey, sounds just like Lotus NOTES :) ...hi Brian....:) Kevin Smith New Service and Support Technology Manager, Marketing Resources are now at: Ascend Communications http://www.ascend.com/service - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Compu$erve RFC 1123 5.3.3 violation Randy Bush (Nov 15)
- Re: Compu$erve RFC 1123 5.3.3 violation Jared Mauch (Nov 15)
- Re: Compu$erve RFC 1123 5.3.3 violation NetSurfer (Nov 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re[2]: Compu$erve RFC 1123 5.3.3 violation Kevin Smith (Nov 20)