nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Virtual" web servers (was Re: IP Allocation)
From: Pete Davis <pete () eagle deardorff com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 10:28:31 -0500 (EST)
Am I getting confused here myself, or are we talking about HTTP/1.1 rather than HTML 1.1 ?
We are in fact talking about HTTP/1.1. It was a quick brain typo.
One good reason at the moment for not moving to only providing support for HTTP/1.1 is the lack of support for it in lynx, which many blind people use as a browser, and lack of support for which by ISPs would probably be fairly politically unpopular.
Lynx 2.5 and 2.6 appear to be HTTP/1.1 compliant and support the host feature that we are talking about. (Atleast in the testing we have done). -Pete ========================================================================= Peter Davis - Sr. Systems & Network Engineer <pete () tiac net> The Internet Access Company PO Box 1098 Bedford MA 617-276-7200 Mail info () tiac net for a list of access-points! ========================================================================= - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- IP Allocation Pete Davis (Nov 19)
- Re: IP Allocation Michael Dillon (Nov 19)
- Re: IP Allocation Peter Galbavy (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Lyndon.Levesley (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Randy Bush (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Michael Handler (Nov 20)
- "Virtual" web servers (was Re: IP Allocation) Martin Cooper (Nov 20)
- Re: "Virtual" web servers (was Re: IP Allocation) Pete Davis (Nov 20)
- Re: "Virtual" web servers (was Re: IP Allocation) Jared Mauch (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Michael Dillon (Nov 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IP Allocation Jim Fleming (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Dima Volodin (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Paul A Vixie (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Dima Volodin (Nov 20)
- RE: IP Allocation Jim Fleming (Nov 20)