nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic address allocation policy
From: Billy Biggs <ae687 () freenet carleton ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 15:56:24 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 19 Nov 1996, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Eric Germann writes:The barrier to entry for that poor person is significantly higher, in the real world, for the poor person. Net access may be had for $20/month. But the hardware is a significant barrier for the poor person.Used PCs capable of providing net access are very cheap these days -- $100 will get you a not entirely unreasonable setup for many purposes.
Even cheeper. Used VTs are excellent for this sort of purpose, etc. However, there has been a dramatic decrease in the number of providers offering shell or text-based Internet access. The biggest problem I see to the situation is when users _and_ providers believe they need high-powered computers to access 'the net'. -- Billy Biggs ae687 () freenet carleton ca - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Internic address allocation policy, (continued)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy David Carmean (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy alex (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Kim Hubbard (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy David Carmean (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Matthew Petach (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy David R. Conrad (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Perry E. Metzger (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Jared Mauch (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Billy Biggs (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Kim Hubbard (Nov 19)