nanog mailing list archives
Re: Inter-exchange media types
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Fri, 03 May 1996 09:46:02 -0700
A new stdaddr draft is forthcoming shortly. This other conversation is of interest, though. We're arguing about 100Mb/s interconnect technology as if we all planned to keep using it for some significant period. That's not so. Two years from now it'll be 622Mb/s or it'll be a dead concept. PMTUD matters, and TCP MSS (therefore IP MTU) matters because it will dictate the frame rate to the routers and the end hosts. Bytes are cheap, frames cost. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Jeremy Porter (Apr 30)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Havard . Eidnes (May 03)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Jon Zeeff (May 03)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Havard . Eidnes (May 03)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Paul A Vixie (May 03)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Jeremy Porter (May 03)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Mike O'Dell (May 04)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Jon Zeeff (May 04)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Curtis Villamizar (May 06)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Jon Zeeff (May 03)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Havard . Eidnes (May 03)