nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted?
From: Bill Fenner <fenner () parc xerox com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 13:33:03 PDT
In message <199605301545.KAA15633 () crash ops neosoft com> you write:
We are not seeing any video or audio from the NANOG meeting session. Is there some sort of problem with the transmission?
According to mtrace, MBONE.SESQUI.NET is dropping all the packets that NANOG is sending. This is presumably some bug in Cisco's DVMRP implementation. Bill Source Response Dest Packet Statistics For Only For Traffic 128.164.192.15 204.162.228.2 All Multicast Traffic From 128.164.192.15 v __/ rtt 209 ms Lost/Sent = Pct Rate To 224.2.234.159 128.164.192.15 ? v ^ ttl 32 14/666 = 2% 66 pps 14/665 = 2% 66 pps 128.167.252.196 cpk-mc1.sura.net v ^ ttl 33 200/1577 = 13% 157 pps -1/651 = 0% 65 pps 137.39.43.34 MBONE1.UU.NET v ^ ttl 66 -7/1313 = 0% 131 pps -4/652 = 0% 65 pps 192.41.177.247 mae-bone.psi.net v ^ ttl 67 148/1584 = 9% 158 pps 656/656 =100% 65 pps 128.241.254.1 MBONE.SESQUI.NET v ^ ttl 67 3/5 = --% 0 pps 0/0 = --% 0 pps 204.70.114.29 204.70.114.45 dec3800-1-fddi-1.Dallas.mci.net v ^ ttl 69 0/142 = 0% 14 pps 0/0 = --% 0 pps 206.109.1.253 core1-e0.hou.neo.net Output pruned v ^ ttl 69 0/4 = --% 0 pps 0/0 = --% 0 pps 206.109.4.50 crash.ops.NeoSoft.COM Prune sent upstream v \__ ttl 69 0 0 pps 0 0 pps 206.109.4.50 204.162.228.2 Receiver Query Source - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- NANOG meeting mulicasted? Scott Mace (May 30)
- Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted? Curtis Generous (May 30)
- Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted? Bill Fenner (May 30)
- Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted? Mark Boolootian (May 30)
- Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted? Curtis Generous (May 30)
- Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted? Bill Fenner (May 30)
- Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted? Mark Boolootian (May 30)
- Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted? Bill Fenner (May 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted? Stan Barber (May 30)
- Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted? Curtis Generous (May 30)