nanog mailing list archives
Re: aggregation in 207/8
From: Sean Doran <smd () icp net>
Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 01:36:51 +0100
| Is it just me, or does the level of aggregation within 207/8 really suck? I don't know what you mean. I only see /18s, /17s and shorter prefixes. This looks like really good aggregation to me. OTOH, we're rather liberal in what we pass along from our paying customers, but the fix for that is known. access-list 112. Knock yourself out. Sean. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- aggregation in 207/8 Eric Kozowski (May 28)
- Re: aggregation in 207/8 Avi Freedman (May 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: aggregation in 207/8 Sean Doran (May 28)
- Re: aggregation in 207/8 Sean Doran (May 28)
- Re: aggregation in 207/8 Eric Kozowski (May 29)