nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.)
From: Michael Dillon <michael () memra com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 20:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 27 May 1996, Tim Bass wrote: I don't see why JF needs defending. He said that IPv8 is encapsulated in IPv4 therefore network operators should not need to know about it.
It is anti-social to speak of "other paradigms", "what the NSF did
Try com-priv () psi com Operations people only deal with the plumbing of the Internet, not with what flows through the pipes or who controls the taps. In fact, NANOG people don't even really deal with all operational issues but only with that subset related to running the Internet core in North America. Michael Dillon ISP & Internet Consulting Memra Software Inc. Fax: +1-604-546-3049 http://www.memra.com E-mail: michael () memra com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) @NANOG-LIST (May 26)
- Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Dorian Kim (May 26)
- Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Paul A Vixie (May 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Jim Fleming (May 27)
- Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) @NANOG-LIST (May 27)
- Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Michael Dillon (May 27)
- RE: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Nathan Stratton (May 27)
- Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) @NANOG-LIST (May 27)
- RE: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Jim Fleming (May 27)