nanog mailing list archives
Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service
From: matthew () scruz net (Matthew Kaufman)
Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 17:48:54 -0700
Original message <199605072153.AA13332 () zephyr isi edu> From: bmanning () isi edu (Bill Manning) Date: May 7, 14:53 Subject: Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service
On Tue, 7 May 1996, Kent W. England wrote:Pac Bell has announced their LA NAP is operational. Contact and details below.Is there not already a MAE-LA? Why would thay have an LA NAP if even MAE-LA hasn't taken off as of yet? Just a question. Christian NielsenYes, there is. I would expect that the NAP service is offering is an extention of the existing BayArea service. This approach reduces the cost of entry of entry for people you are in the So.Cal. area to a local loop charge. It appears that thye believe that a "distributed" service is more effective than two seperate exchanges. -- --bill -- End of excerpt from Bill Manning
As far as I know, PacBell wouldn't be permitted to extend PVCs between the LA NAP and the SF NAP -matthew kaufman matthew () scruz net - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service Kent W. England (May 07)
- Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service Christian Nielsen (May 07)
- Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service Bill Manning (May 07)
- Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service Pushpendra Mohta (May 07)
- Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service Bill Manning (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service Matthew Kaufman (May 07)
- RE: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service Jim Browning (May 07)
- Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service Christian Nielsen (May 07)