![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting AP Article
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 19:17:06 -0500
Perhaps it is 'interesting' because this issue has made it into the mainstream popular press? - paul At 11:24 PM 3/13/96 +0000, Larry J. Plato wrote:
Steve, I am not really trying to flame you but why is this article interesting? It is really a poorly written rehash of the filtering policy Sprint has discussed for the last 18 months. I don't agree w/ Sprint's position but I don't see this article as being particularly interesting. It's not even very well written. If anything I find it annoying and irresponsible that the author did not seem, IMHO, to research his topic very well. As far as I can tell he neither asked the opinion of Sprint, or any other major NSP, as to why someone would do this. Yet he had the call to title his article "Sprint says ..." I think this is sloppy, yellow, journalism. Larry Plato I speak for myself only #include <std.disclaimer>
Current thread:
- Interesting AP Article Steve Rubin (Mar 13)
- Re: Interesting AP Article Larry J. Plato (Mar 13)
- Re: Interesting AP Article Michael Dillon (Mar 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Interesting AP Article Paul Ferguson (Mar 13)
- RE: Interesting AP Article Jim Fleming (Mar 13)
- Re: Interesting AP Article Steve Rubin (Mar 14)
- RE: Interesting AP Article Jim Fleming (Mar 13)
- Re: Interesting AP Article Curtis Villamizar (Mar 14)
- Re: Interesting AP Article HAKNER JEFF (Mar 14)
- Re: Interesting AP Article Mark Boolootian (Mar 15)
- Re: Interesting AP Article Larry J. Plato (Mar 13)