nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET stops peering at MAE-West
From: "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 17:50:20 -0800
At 12:07 AM 3/24/96 -0800, Mark Kent wrote:
Why haven't more networks taken advantage of the PacBell NAP facility in San Francisco??I should note that I don't see any issues going over the SF NAP from my neck of the woods. -mark
Give it a try. Pacific Bell has upgraded the Bay Area NAP to Stratacom BPX ATM switches and the new PacBell LA NAP will also be a BPX switch. These switches have sufficient buffer size to manage OC-3 connections. Check out our NAP stats page http://www.PacBell.COM/Products/NAP/Stats/ to see how much aggregate traffic is already flowing through the Bay Area NAP. Still some headroom left and no cell loss! --Kent
Current thread:
- UUNET stops peering at MAE-West Roy (Mar 23)
- Re: UUNET stops peering at MAE-West Andrew Partan (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: UUNET stops peering at MAE-West Jim Browning (Mar 23)
- UUNET stops peering at MAE-West Mark Kent (Mar 24)
- Re: UUNET stops peering at MAE-West Curtis Villamizar (Mar 25)
- Re: UUNET stops peering at MAE-West Kent W. England (Mar 24)