nanog mailing list archives
Re: mae-west congestion
From: lance () nsipo arc nasa gov (Lance Tatman)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 09:22:00 -0800
Yes, agis is on the MFS side and mci+sprint is on the nasa side, though it is my understanding that mci put in a line on the mfs side as well. I believe ANS has pulled a line in on the mfs side as well. The two sides of the mae-west are connected by an OC-3. At 11:43 PM 3/21/96 -0800, Nikos Mouat wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 1996, Peter Kaminski wrote:What I don't understand is why that has _stayed_ saturated... it seems to me that some of the big players would have rerouted their traffic by now to
avoid
subjecting it to this, which would also have the side effect of causing the problem to, at least for the short term, go away....or why MFS hasn't installed a Gigaswitch there, or whatever. We're seeing 20% - 30% packet loss through AGIS to MCI and Sprintlink during the day, and it's not fun.isn't agis on the mfs side and mci+sprint on the nasa side? (i know that net99 was/is on the mfs side, but i dunno if agis is using their cage or have a different one) are the two 'sides' of mae-west still connected by only a ds3? /nm
Current thread:
- mae-west congestion Matthew Kaufman (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Kevin Oberman (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Stephen Stuart (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Mark Boolootian (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Jonathan Heiliger (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Peter Kaminski (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Nikos Mouat (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: mae-west congestion Lance Tatman (Mar 22)
- Re: mae-west congestion Kevin Oberman (Mar 21)