nanog mailing list archives
Re: MCI
From: Gordon Cook <gcook () tigger jvnc net>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:02:19 -0500 (EST)
I am told that Cisco has an OC-3 interface to its 75XX series of routers. If so why would you need a cluster of routers around each ATM switch? ********************************************************************* Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher Subscriptions: Individ-ascii $85 The COOK Report on Internet Individ. hard copy $150 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA Small Corp & Gov't $200 (609) 882-2572 Corporate $350 Internet: cook () cookreport com Corporate Site Lic. $650 http://pobox.com/cook/ for new COOK Report Glossary of Internet terms ********************************************************************* On Tue, 19 Mar 1996, Dorian Kim wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 1996, David Miller wrote:On Mon, 18 Mar 1996 Jasper () cloud9 net wrote: What kinds of routers can route at near wire speeds a bunch of ports at 155Mb ATM?None right now. Gigarouter can handle it theoretically, but... I'm being picky, but it's a moot question since doing wirespeed OC3c using ATM is impossible in of itself. Hell, mapping of SONET framings to ATM cells take off about 6 mbps right there. Anyway, until then you have a router that can do this, there always are ATM switches + cluster of routers. -dorian
Current thread:
- Re: MCI David Miller (Mar 19)
- Re: MCI Dorian Kim (Mar 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MCI Wolfgang Henke (Mar 19)
- Re: MCI Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 19)
- Re: MCI Wolfgang Henke (Mar 19)
- Re: MCI Paul Ferguson (Mar 19)
- Re: MCI Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 19)
- Re: MCI Robert Craig (Mar 19)
- RE: MCI Bharat Ranjan (Mar 21)
- RE: MCI Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 21)
- RE: MCI Bharat Ranjan (Mar 21)
- RE: MCI Bharat Ranjan (Mar 22)
(Thread continues...)