nanog mailing list archives

Re: Allocation of IP Addresses

From: Tim Bass (@NANOG-LIST) <nanog () dune silkroad com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 16:41:01 -0500 (EST)

Bob corrects me:

IPv7 was the CATNIP proposal.  I think you have to go out to IPv9 to get an
unused version #.


Guess if IPv7 is CAPNIP, then IPv9 will have to be DOGFOO :-)

Thanks and regards,

Tim

Current thread:

Re: Allocation of IP Addresses, (continued)
- - - Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Gordon Cook (Mar 14)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Fleming (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Paul Ferguson (Mar 14)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Fleming (Mar 15)
  - RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Barry James (Mar 15)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Browning (Mar 15)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Paul Ferguson (Mar 15)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Browning (Mar 15)
  - Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Perry E. Metzger (Mar 15)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Robert Moskowitz (Mar 15)
  - Re: Allocation of IP Addresses @NANOG-LIST (Mar 15)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Fleming (Mar 16)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Fleming (Mar 17)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Paul Ferguson (Mar 18)
  - Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 18)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Robert Moskowitz (Mar 18)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Curtis Villamizar (Mar 19)