nanog mailing list archives
Re: Address allocation stats
From: Ehud Gavron <GAVRON () ACES COM>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 1996 01:46:54 -0700 (MST)
You did not go wrong...
D'oh. Time to have another Sammy.
(side note... Net zero will be harder to reclaim than net 127)
Politically easy, legacy-kernel-wise nigh impossible :) That code is _designed_ to waste net 0. E (sammy := Samuel Adams Lager) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Address allocation stats Mark Kosters (Jun 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Address allocation stats Paul Ferguson (Jun 04)
- Re: Address allocation stats Bill Manning (Jun 04)
- Re: Address allocation stats Ehud Gavron (Jun 05)
- Re: Address allocation stats Bill Manning (Jun 05)
- Re: Address allocation stats Ehud Gavron (Jun 05)
- Re: Address allocation stats Bill Manning (Jun 04)
- Re: Address allocation stats Kai Alexander Scharwacht (Jun 11)
- Re: Address allocation stats bmanning (Jun 07)
- Re: Address allocation stats @NANOG-LIST (Jun 07)
- Re: Address allocation stats Jeremy Porter (Jun 12)
- Re: Address allocation stats Havard . Eidnes (Jun 18)
- Re: Address allocation stats Frank T Solensky (Jun 18)