nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe
From: jones () nsipo arc nasa gov (Wm. Prichard Jones)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:23:23 -0700
Cool. Off-shore oil leases bring a tidy sum. Government is trying to emulate private enterprise these days. But careful when you open this box. It could ... argh#$%. Kent is right on. /bill jones, and chargeback afficianado nasa ames research center In referenace to: --- Forwarded mail from "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com>
From nanog-owner () merit edu Tue Jun 18 14:53:21 1996
Return-Path: <nanog-owner () merit edu> Received: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 14:53:19 -0700 (PDT) from merit.edu (RFC1413 sender merit.edu [35.1.1.42]) by nsipo.arc.nasa.gov (8.7.1/1.5) id OAA09938 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by merit.edu (8.7.5/merit-2.0) id NAA18345 for nanog-outgoing; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 13:48:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailhub.cts.com (mailhub.cts.com [192.188.72.25]) by merit.edu (8.7.5/merit-2.0) with SMTP id NAA18340 for <nanog () merit edu>; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 13:48:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from netguru.cts.com(really [204.94.77.43]) by mailhub.cts.com via smail with smtp id <m0uW4sw-000V85C () mailhub cts com> for <nanog () merit edu>; Tue, 18 Jun 96 10:48:14 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.1.92 1996-Mar-19 #3 built 1996-Apr-21) Message-Id: <2.2.32.19960618175326.00725468 () mail cts com> X-Sender: kwe () mail cts com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:53:26 -0700 To: gih () aarnet edu au (Geoff Huston) From: "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com> Subject: Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Cc: nanog () merit edu Sender: owner-nanog () merit edu Precedence: bulk At 08:40 PM 6/18/96 +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
Of course this is not always the case, and typically a public resource
distribution
space couples regulation with a tariff to achieve the ultimate outcome of fair and equitable distribution. The radio spectrum is perhaps the best covered territory here when looking at this space in relation to the policy debate over IP address management.
In this debate we have to take care when we talk about charging for registration, whether we are intending to: a) cover the cost of administering a resource (such as .com) b) trying to let a market set prices c) trying to cover the national debt (as with spectrum auctions) Let's just be very sure that if and when fees or prices for addresses are agreed, that someone doesn't step up and claim the right to auction addresses to cover the US budget deficit. There might be a few people in DC that would think to do that. --Kent --- End of forwarded message from "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe, (continued)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe David R. Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Gopi K Garge (Jun 18)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 18)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Alex.Bligh (Jun 18)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Jon Zeeff (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Yakov Rekhter (Jun 17)
- IP addresses for sale? Michael Dillon (Jun 18)