nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe
From: "Brian Carpenter CERN-CN" <brian () dxcoms cern ch>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 13:59:59 +0200 (MET DST)
4) you can't charge for addresses because they're just numbers and have no value (tell that to the US Treasury)
...
P.S. So which rathole are we going to go down this time? 30 quatloos on rathole #4 (it's my favorite 'cause it's so silly (Hi Brian!)).
Well, since you ask... My view is still that charging for routing announcements is necessary and sufficient - but as I've said before, I think that registries should charge for their *services*, and allocating an address block is a service. So I don't think we're that far apart. See you in Montreal. Brian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Sprint's route filters and Europe, (continued)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 04)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Curtis Villamizar (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Alex.Bligh (Jun 04)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Michael Dillon (Jun 03)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Mike Norris (Jun 04)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe David R. Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Brian Carpenter CERN-CN (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe David R. Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Brian Carpenter CERN-CN (Jun 18)