nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ping flooding (fwd)
From: Nevin Williams <nevin () ans net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 06:43:01 +0000 (UTC)
Michael Dillon writes:
On Tue, 9 Jul 1996, Daniel W. McRobb wrote:There will likely never be a means for a single NSP to track down the real source of spoofed packets using IPv4. Service providers won't be letting other service providers track spoofed packets through their network.Why not? Don't telcos do this? Or if your answer is that telcos only do it for the police and not for each other, then my question would be why can't we form an Internet equivalent, maybe affiliated with something like CERT, that can make these requests and with whom NSP's would cooperate.
What sort of incentive or penalty do you think would enable this cooperation? Nevin -- -Nevin Williams ANS Network Operations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Michael Dillon (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) George Eddy (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Michael Dillon (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Paul A Vixie (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Curtis Villamizar (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Daniel W. McRobb (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Michael Dillon (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Daniel W. McRobb (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Michael Dillon (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Nevin Williams (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Michael Dillon (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Larry J. Plato (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Michael Dillon (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) George Eddy (Jul 08)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Curtis Villamizar (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Daniel W. McRobb (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Daniel W. McRobb (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Daniel W. McRobb (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 10)