nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why aren't ISPs providing stratum 1 NTP service?
From: dgaudet () hotwired com (Dean Gaudet)
Date: 23 Jul 1996 10:15:45 GMT
In article <hot.mailing-lists.nanog-199607222012.AA05135 () jotun EU net>, Per Gregers Bilse <bilse () EU net> wrote:
Yep, works. Management isn't a problem if each box is fitted with two interfaces and addresses, one for public consumption of contents, one for internal use. Not that we have done any of this for real (yet).
I've actually been doing that here for months (different service and mgmt addresses). If you dig www.hotwired.com both those addresses exist on two machines, and are on loopbacks. There's a bunch of nice tricks you can pull. But I feel like I'm going to get flamed for straying away from network operations. Oops. Dean - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Why aren't people changing their subject lines when threads drift?, (continued)
- Re: Why aren't people changing their subject lines when threads drift? Paul A Vixie (Jul 25)
- Re: Why aren't people changing their subject lines when threads drift? Alan Hannan (Jul 26)
- Ping triangulation Michael Dillon (Jul 26)
- Re: Ping triangulation Roy (Jul 27)
- Re: Ping triangulation Todd Graham Lewis (Jul 27)
- Re: Why aren't people changing their subject lines when threads drift? Michael Shields (Jul 29)
- Re: Why aren't ISPs providing stratum 1 NTP service? Dorian R. Kim (Jul 21)
- Re: Why aren't ISPs providing stratum 1 NTP service? Michael A. Patton (Jul 22)
- Re: Why aren't ISPs providing stratum 1 NTP service? Dean Gaudet (Jul 22)
- Re: Why aren't ISPs providing stratum 1 NTP service? Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Why aren't ISPs providing stratum 1 NTP service? Dean Gaudet (Jul 23)