nanog mailing list archives
Re: T3 or not to T3
From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian () cic net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 02:23:53 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 22 Jul 1996, Avi Freedman wrote:
I'm not arguing that getting transit via an XP fabric is a bad idea - as long as the XP provider gets beefy enough switching and as long as the transit providers have enough ports into their routers from the XP fabric, it's a fine idea - much better than lots of rack-rack cables. But boxes w/ hard drives are a different story IMO.
Agreed. IMO, the best place for these things is one hops away from an XP, either in a provider's network or behind a content provider's router that's connected to the XP. -dorian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- T3 or not to T3 Dean Gaudet (Jul 21)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Michael Dillon (Jul 21)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Stephen Stuart (Jul 21)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Michael Dillon (Jul 21)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Stephen Stuart (Jul 22)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Avi Freedman (Jul 21)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Dorian R. Kim (Jul 21)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Nathan Stratton (Jul 22)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Karl Mueller (Jul 22)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Nathan Stratton (Jul 22)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Avi Freedman (Jul 22)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Alec H. Peterson (Jul 23)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Stephen Stuart (Jul 21)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Michael Dillon (Jul 21)
- Re: T3 or not to T3 Stephen Stuart (Jul 22)