nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ping flooding (fwd)
From: "Daniel W. McRobb" <dwm () ans net>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 1996 21:23:01 EDT
'tis also very important to know the route taken for a net when analyzing the data. Discrepancies here can be huge and completely invalidate any conclusions you might make about how much traffic is traversing a given path.For this we like combined interface stats; AS-based traffic matrices are (from our point of view) mostly useful for end-to-end measurements.
Forgot to answer this one point... Combined interface stats aren't very useful for a scenario we commonly entertain: what will happen if I move Big Customer A's ingress to ANSnet from ANS border router X to ANS border router Y? I need to know who they're talking to in order to answer that question. Typically large portions of the ANS mesh will be affected, and I need to know how. Daniel ~~~~~~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd), (continued)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Curtis Villamizar (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Daniel W. McRobb (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Daniel W. McRobb (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Daniel W. McRobb (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 10)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) John Hawkinson (Jul 10)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 10)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Daniel W. McRobb (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Curtis Villamizar (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Curtis Villamizar (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Dick St.Peters (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) Todd Graham Lewis (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding (fwd) George Herbert (Jul 09)