nanog mailing list archives
Re: Concerning 192.x.x.x and routing
From: Joe Provo <jprovo () romulus ultranet com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 1996 14:39:29 -0500 (EST)
Just looks like a case of someone believing different DBs in whatever order they choose. Not sure why it would 'suddenly' manifest, but MCI is telling it loudly enough for sprint to believe it [appended] and for it to work. I don't know other 192.x.x.x hit [none were listed], but 192.108.186.0/24 (one of my customers) seems just peachy from BBN-land. Fireless smoke or a transient? Cheers, Joe Provo Network Operations Center UltraNet Communications, Inc. --- % whorad 192.135.135.0 route: 192.135.135.0/24 descr: Washington High School descr: 2525 N. Sherman Blvd descr: Milwaukee descr: WI 53210, USA origin: AS2381 comm-list: COMM_NSFNET advisory: AS690 1:3561(27) 2:3561(218) 3:3561(147) 4:3561(11) 5:3561(144) mnt-by: MAINT-AS2381 changed: nsfnet-admin () merit edu 950411 source: RADB route: 192.0.0.0/2 descr: See aut-num for AS0 origin: AS0 advisory: AS690 1:0 mnt-by: ANS changed: selina () ans net 951003 source: ANS route: 192.135.135.0/24 descr: WHS-DOM descr: Washington High School descr: 2525 N. Sherman Blvd descr: Milwaukee, WI 53210 descr: USA origin: AS2381 advisory: AS690 1:3561 mnt-by: CICNET-NS changed: tko () cic net 950410 source: MCI --- %trac 192.135.135.1 traceroute to 192.135.135.1 (192.135.135.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 core-7.ultra.net (199.232.56.27) 5 ms 3 ms 4 ms 2 sl-pen-5-S3/0-T1.sprintlink.net (144.228.65.73) 62 ms 44 ms 37 ms 3 sl-pen-2-F0/0.sprintlink.net (144.228.60.2) 76 ms 77 ms 157 ms 4 sprintnap.mci.net (192.157.69.11) 58 ms 54 ms 60 ms 5 border2-hssi1-0.NewYork.mci.net (204.70.45.5) 61 ms 54 ms 95 ms 6 core-fddi-1.NewYork.mci.net (204.70.3.17) 56 ms 36 ms 56 ms 7 core1-hssi-2.WestOrange.mci.net (204.70.1.98) 74 ms 52 ms 67 ms 8 core1-hssi-3.NorthRoyalton.mci.net (204.70.1.101) 84 ms 115 ms 132 ms 9 core-hssi-2.Chicago.mci.net (204.70.1.93) 118 ms 80 ms 63 ms 10 border2-fddi-0.Chicago.mci.net (204.70.3.82) 66 ms 66 ms 78 ms 11 cicnet.Chicago.mci.net (204.70.25.10) 69 ms 72 ms 61 ms 12 dgf-fddi1.cic.net (192.217.0.4) 54 ms 61 ms 65 ms 13 dgc-fddi0.cic.net (131.103.1.18) 74 ms 56 ms 74 ms 14 mke-dgc.cic.net (131.103.26.226) 277 ms 92 ms 290 ms 15 wiscnet.csd.uwm.edu (129.89.6.3) 154 ms 317 ms 141 ms 16 marquette-milwaukee.wiscnet.net (140.189.32.2) 127 ms 119 ms 477 ms 17 csdnb.csd.mu.edu (134.48.1.80) 222 ms 134 ms 189 ms 18 192.135.135.9 (192.135.135.9) 508 ms 1063 ms 432 ms 19 192.135.135.1 (192.135.135.1) 316 ms 373 ms 453 ms -- # [ end of file]
Current thread:
- Concerning 192.x.x.x and routing postel (Jan 08)
- Re: Concerning 192.x.x.x and routing Dorian Kim (Jan 08)
- Re: Concerning 192.x.x.x and routing mike (Jan 08)
- Re: Concerning 192.x.x.x and routing Mike O'Dell (Jan 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Concerning 192.x.x.x and routing Joe Provo (Jan 08)
- Re: Concerning 192.x.x.x and routing Jeff Olenchek (Jan 08)