nanog mailing list archives

Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations


From: Alan Barrett <apb () iafrica com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:08:57 +0200 (GMT+0200)

(Sending only to nanog, as per the recent coin-toss decision.)

From: Andrew Partan <asp () uunet uu net>

I suppose that if you find a set of companies that are all willing to
be part of the consortium & just part of the consortium, then you could
do addressing for this consortium as a whole.  Hey!  I think that we
just invented provider (consortium) based addressing again.

One can also play tricks with tunnels, so that the folk with long prefixes
inside the consortium's aggregate can get to the consortium without
anything else needing to know a route for the long prefix.

The packets travel farther (from source to consortium, and then from
consortium to destination via the tunnel), but that's OK, because both the
destination and the consortium are paying.

--apb (Alan Barrett)


Current thread: