nanog mailing list archives
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
From: Sean Doran <smd () icp net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 00:02:45 -0000
| The registries (although I shouldn't speak for all of them) would be | more than happy to allocate address space in whatever way the ISPs | agree is the "right way". The problem is, you can't agree on what's | the "right way" of doing it. It's like herding cats without the benefit of a laser pointer. | They do not want to be tied to their upstream ISP. Understandable. Hence, the people who actually develop technology to renumber ISPs and things downstream from them, whether that be with NATs (hi cisco) or things emanating out of PIER, will be heros. (Hopefully rich too). | But consider the hundreds of ISPs that don't. What's NANOG? Sigh. Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations, (continued)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Dorian Kim (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Alan Hannan (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Dorian Kim (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations George Herbert (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Avi Freedman (Jan 26)
- cidr & livingston (was Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations) Russ Pagenkopf (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations bmanning (Jan 30)
- Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Forrest W. Christian (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations David R. Conrad (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Forrest W. Christian (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Kim Hubbard (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Forrest W. Christian (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Forrest W. Christian (Jan 27)