nanog mailing list archives
Re: PacBell NAP and Co-location
From: "Warren K. Williams" <wkwilli () PacBell COM>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 23:11:08 -0800
Pushpendra Mohta wrote:
Does the arrangement you mention still require that Pacific Bell retain ownership of the equipment that is placed at the Pacific Bell site ?
No, it does not.
Is a draft online somewhere ?
No, we have not as yet drafted a contract for customers. I frankly wasn't certain as to the demand for colocation. I knew that it had been a bone of contention for working with Pacific Bell in the past, and as a result worked with various parties here to resolve the issue. As soon as I hear from a serious customer requesting a co-located solution as part of their attachment to the NAP, I'll pull together what is needed from a contractual standpoint, and put a draft on the web. We have the physical arrangements made and reserved, if you will, in case there is a true demand. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Warren K. Williams, Director - NAP Project Management Pacific Bell Business Communications Services Email: wkwilli () pacbell com Phone: 510.867.9065 -------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- PacBell NAP and Co-location Warren K. Williams (Jan 18)
- Re: PacBell NAP and Co-location Pushpendra Mohta (Jan 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PacBell NAP and Co-location Warren K. Williams (Jan 20)