Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations

[Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>]

At 02:16 PM 2/2/96 +1100, Geoff Huston wrote:

> > >    We are working on the 192.x.x.x swamp right now.
> > >    Rough estimates (with much more accurate data @ NANOG)
> > >
> > >            60% - invalid or missing contact information
> >
> > This is interesting.  How about a policy that says if nobody can contact you
> > and none of your addresses are reachable, then after some period, your
> > addresses get recycled.
>
> How about a policy which says that if you fail to pay an annual amount
> by a due date then a process is commenced with an outcome such that
> your registration details expire and the associated number space is no
> longer registered to you.
>
> Geoff

Would this process, perhaps, be associated with a route announcement
charging scheme?

- paul