nanog mailing list archives
Re: Exchanges that matter...
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 14:06:40 -0800
Joe Rhett <joe () Navigist Com> wrote:
The issue that everyone seems to be overlooking is network design flexibility. Even if ATM has higher overhead, you can only grow a FDDI network so much. It really isn't all that hard to max out most FDDI switches.
Nah. The issue is that ATM is a rather expensive way to achieve nothing. And, if you never heard about it before: FDDI is not what people use to send data over backbone lines, no matter what trade mags show in their cute pictures. --vadim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Exchanges that matter..., (continued)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Vadim Antonov (Dec 05)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Bill Sommerfeld (Dec 05)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Vadim Antonov (Dec 05)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Tim Salo (Dec 06)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Vadim Antonov (Dec 06)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Scott Huddle (Dec 06)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Jim Dixon (Dec 06)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Alex.Bligh (Dec 07)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Dave O'Shea (Dec 06)
- RE: Exchanges that matter... Danny Stroud (Dec 06)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Vadim Antonov (Dec 07)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Joe Rhett (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Nathan Stratton (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Stephen Stuart (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Nathan Stratton (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Jonathan Heiliger (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Matthew Petach (Dec 09)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Avi Freedman (Dec 09)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Nathan Stratton (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Stephen Stuart (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Alec H. Peterson (Dec 08)