nanog mailing list archives
Updates, peering & flaps [Was: RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys.]
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 21:00:29 -0500
At 05:12 PM 4/5/96 -0800, Kent W. England wrote:
BTW, I thought it was the updates, peerings and flaps that was the true problem, not the absolute number of routing table entries.
I submit that its a combination of all the above, and that the problem grows in scope as each linearly increase both in size and/or frequency. Of course, route-dampening helps on one front, but its non-trivial to code a smaller routing table when the number of routes increase. :-) - paul
Current thread:
- Updates, peering & flaps [Was: RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys.] Paul Ferguson (Apr 05)