nanog mailing list archives
RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys.
From: "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 17:12:24 -0800
At 08:25 AM 4/5/96 -0600, Tim Salo wrote:
Perhaps, the [anticipated] consolidation of ISPs will be a significant event in the efforts to control routing table size. -tjs
Do we need address leasing to hasten that process or should we let the market decide? In any event, anyone buying up a bunch of ISPs will have a difficult time cleaning up the aggregation of addresses they inherit. --Kent BTW, I thought it was the updates, peerings and flaps that was the true problem, not the absolute number of routing table entries.
Current thread:
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys., (continued)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Tim Salo (Apr 05)
- Re: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Avi Freedman (Apr 05)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Michael Dillon (Apr 05)
- Re: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Tim Salo (Apr 05)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Jim Fleming (Apr 05)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Jim Fleming (Apr 05)
- Re: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Justin W. Newton (Apr 05)
- Re: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Christopher E. Stefan (Apr 07)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Jim Fleming (Apr 05)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Jim Fleming (Apr 05)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Kent W. England (Apr 05)
- Re: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Curtis Villamizar (Apr 08)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Tim Salo (Apr 05)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Tim Salo (Apr 05)