nanog mailing list archives
Re: 206.82.160.0/22
From: David R Conrad <davidc () iij ad jp>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 10:43:30 +0900
Are you saying that Sprint refused to allocate the space you required?That last sentence is based on an assumption not a known fact.
?? It was a question.
I think the real problem here is that Kazakhstan should have a block of addresses with a short enough prefix to guarantee routing and these addresses should have been allocated out of this block.
No. Political geography has little to do with the topology of the Internet, thus allocating to a country doesn't correspond to topological addressing. One might argue that a service provider in Kazakhstan should have a short prefix, but a similar argument can be made for any service provider.
The obvious solution to this immediate problem is to guarantee routing for the long prefix until the event in Kazakhstan is over and then to think hard about what to do about similar cases that are not for short term events.
Right, except you can *never* guarantee routing -- it is a cooperative effort among service providers and some service providers may choose not to cooperate. However, the organization wishing to have the long prefix routed may pay the routing service provider(s) extra for the special handling necessary to insure the highest probability of routability to the sites the organization wants to reach. But this gets somewhat complicated. I would think an easier solution would be to simply get a block from the upstream ISP... Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- 206.82.160.0/22 Kai (Sep 21)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 David R Conrad (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Michael Dillon (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 David R Conrad (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Eric . M . Aupperle (Sep 22)
- Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Paul Ferguson (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 22)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 David R Conrad (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 John Riordan (Sep 23)